Kids Who Kill
A child's finger on the trigger points to tragedy. Psychologist
Helen Smith talks about the warning signs of juvenile violence
and what can be done to stop it.
By Stephanie Piper
The recent rash
of school shootings has focused national attention on an issue
Dr. Helen Smith addresses every day: violent kids. Smith, who
received both her bachelor's ('83) and doctoral ('94) degrees
from UT Knoxville, is a forensic psychologist in Knoxville. She
interprets psychological information for the legal system, often
testifying as an expert witness in cases ranging from child custody
to mental competency. She also sees private patients for psychotherapy.
And in her spare time, she is writing a book on a grim but timely
topic: kids who kill.
"It's
a subject that has interested me for a long time," Smith
says. "I had started research for the book well before the
current wave of school shootings began last fall."
The impetus came from a 17-year-old boy she was asked to evaluate
about two years ago. Psychological tests revealed that he was
seriously disturbed with violent tendencies, Smith recalls.
"He wasn't threatening a particular person, so I couldn't
call the police," she says. "And he had no health insurance,
so he couldn't be hospitalized or even receive long-term counseling.
I began asking myself how someone gets to this point, and what
might be done to prevent it."
For the disturbed boy, it was already too late. Two weeks
later, Smith learned he had shot and killed someone.
The event strengthened her resolve to understand the phenomenon
of killer kids and to identify early warning signs of dangerous
behavior.
"I wish I could say there was one explanation for this,"
Smith says. "I wish I could tell you the TV show 'South
Park' or violent rap music or MTV was responsible for the school
shootings.
"I don't think it's any one thing. It's a combination of
factors. You have a kid who has a predisposition for problems,
combined with a troubled home situation, like a divorce or parents
who are abusing substances."
And in most cases, it's a youngster with a history of aggressive
behavior.
"I've had preschool teachers tell me they knew from the
time a child was two or three that there was going to be trouble,"
Smith says. "Very often, they're right. These are children
whose anger is way beyond the typical temper tantrum."
Later, these children may torture animals and strike out violently
against siblings and even parents. In nearly every case, they
feel alienated from their peers.
"These kids perceive nobody cares about them. They need
to 'be somebody' quick," she notes.
Paradoxically, the sense of isolation goes hand-in-hand with
a sense of entitlement.
"They think: 'nobody has any rights but me. Nobody feels
any pain but me. I am such a powerful person.'"
"They are not psychoticthey're in touch with reality.
They are conduct disordered," Smith says.
This is actually good news, because conduct disorders can
sometimes be treated. But Smith stresses that early intervention
and careful follow-up care are essential.
"The problem is that with our Jiffy-Pop HMO approach
to mental health, kids who need long-term therapy don't get it,"
she says.
In her own practice, Smith helps conduct disordered children
learn to gauge their level of anger and to plan strategies for
times "when they feel like they're going to blow."
"Maybe they have a favorite teacher they can go sit with,
even if they don't feel like talking."
Adolescence is a turbulent time even for kids without serious
emotional problems, Smith says. For youngsters who are carrying
that extra burden, it is a critical time.
"If we can stop these kids from the act of murder, that's
a huge goal. Usually if they get through adolescence without
killing someone, they go on to lead fairly normal lives."
She stresses that kids who kill are rare.
"Statistics from the Office of Juvenile Justice in Washington
show the percentage rate is about the same as it was 15 or 20
years ago," she notes.
But media coverage of these events has expanded exponentially.
Smith says the media bear some responsibility for the copycat
factor in the recent school shootings.
"I have a problem with the way they portray these kids
in the media. They're almost like heroes. A kid who's already
disturbed, already has violent tendencies, will look at these
pictures and say, 'look at the attention these kids are getting.'
They want to feel powerful, and the ultimate power is holding
someone's life in your hands. It's more helpful to portray these
kids as pathetic social outcasts, which they are."
Smith worries that concerned parents and teachers may focus
on the wrong issues in trying to prevent school violence. While
she does not believe that juveniles should have unsupervised
access to guns, she says that more stringent gun control will
not stop these incidents. A disturbed teenager who is determined
to act out violent fantasies would not hesitate to steal a weapon.
She'd rather see efforts directed at identifying and helping
high-risk kids. The school killers all had made threats before
they acted, she points out. One had even brought a gun to school.
"I'd have a kid who brought a gun to school under heavy
surveillance, either in a mental health facility or an alternative
school," she says. "That's a big thing. The problem
with zero tolerance [automatic expulsion from school for a student
caught with a weapon] is that there's no distinction made between
someone who brings a butter knife to cut an apple and someone
who brings an arsenal."
Most of all, she says, adults need to listen. The common denominator
among young killers is the overwhelming conviction that no one
thinks they're important.
"They prey upon us because we have turned a deaf ear."
Top of Page
.